COLDCARD RNG incident the public record, collected and explained
Informational only, and this site never asks for your seed words. details

Informational only. This is an open source collection of what others have published about the incident, together with an explanation of it. It is not financial, security or legal advice, and not a substitute for professional advice about your own situation. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or speaking for Coinkite. Material is attributed and quoted as published; where sources disagree their scenarios are kept separate with their assumptions rather than reconciled into one answer. Everything is meant to be checked against the linked evidence rather than taken on trust. Act on your own judgement about a particular situation. Editorial standards and corrections.

Do not disclose recovery material to a website, form, message or support account. This site never asks for it, and contributions containing recovery words or private keys are not accepted.

Open-weights models doing the vulnerability search

callebtc-2085329159094489183

https://x.com/callebtc/status/2085329159094489183

Captured screenshot of the post by @callebtc, posted 6 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC
@callebtc posted captured full-size capture → original post →
Author
@callebtc
Organisation
independent
Evidence role
social statement
Posted
Capture status
capture held

calle argues that not a single vulnerability in this wave was found by a US frontier model, and that roughly $10k a day is instead being spent on open-weights models, naming Kimi K3 and Qwen 3.8, to find vulnerabilities in Bitcoin infrastructure. The attached screenshot shows a coding assistant refusing a request during a review of a secp256k1 sample with a notice offering Trusted Access to security professionals, circled in red. Interest: this project's watch list records calle as a Bitcoin Red Team participant, so he is describing work and spending he takes part in. The spend figure and the claim that no frontier model produced a finding are the poster's own and are not verified here.

This post is registered as evidence and has a locally held capture. The original remains the canonical publication.

How to check this yourself

Compare the screenshot or a quotation against the original while it is available.