Disclosure-channel coverage across reviewed repos
callebtc-2085418280253038697
- Author
- @callebtc
- Organisation
- independent
- Evidence role
- social statement
- Posted
- 6 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC
- Capture status
- capture held
A method note in the Bitcoin Red Team thread whose parent, held at callebtc-2085418268689391792, reports 425 projects scanned and 1,029 high and critical findings. It says the campaign's biggest bottleneck is not finding bugs but reaching maintainers: of 426 reviewed projects only 19.5 percent, 83 projects, publish a SECURITY.md, and only 13.1 percent, 56 projects, have an extractable security email, with 28 routing through GitHub advisories and 408 repositories resolved. The attached chart is the source of those figures, and the ask is that maintainers leave an email address in their repositories. Held because it quantifies a coordination problem the incident exposed, and because it bears directly on the responsible-disclosure argument recorded elsewhere in this register. Interest: calle leads the campaign whose reporting volume was itself being criticised at the time. The percentages are the campaign's own measurements and are not verified here.
This post is registered as evidence and has a locally held capture. The original remains the canonical publication. Last checked .
This post is held twice: here, with this project's own note on why it matters, and again as part of the conversation captured at , which is polled for changes. Both copies are the same post; neither is a separate event.
Snapshot and diff bodies for this chain monitor are held in the local evidence archive but withheld from the public site because they can contain the addresses of people who published nothing themselves. Capture times and reviewed change summaries remain available below.
Held captures
0 presentation-noise differences. Sidebar, ticker and other page chrome churn that our review classified as not being changes to what the source says.
The excerpts and plain unified diffs above show the text this project held and how it changed. To verify a quotation, compare it against the page itself or against the Internet Archive's copies, which are independent of this project.
Complete captures are held offline rather than mirrored here, so this page shows diffs and excerpts. If a quotation is ever disputed, the full copy can be produced. Ask.
Compare the screenshot or a quotation against the original while it is available.