COLDCARD vulnerability what happened, and what to do
Informational only, and this site never asks for your recovery words. details

Informational only. This is independent analysis and an evidence-backed explainer, not financial, security or legal advice, and not a substitute for professional advice about your own situation. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or speaking for Coinkite, Block, or any other party named here. Published estimates are attributed, and differing scenarios are kept separate with their assumptions. Act on your own judgement. Editorial standards and corrections.

Do not disclose recovery material to a website, form, message or support account. This site never asks for it. Deliberate recovery on independently verified offline equipment is a separate operation. Seed-word safety.

Operator attribution report

clay-attribution

https://x.com/clay_garrett/status/2083247006139503065

Author
@clay_garrett
Organisation
Block
Evidence role
social statement
Posted
31 Jul 2026, 17:42 UTC
Capture status
capture held
Artefacts held
3

Block's report that the operator used a paid blockchain-services account; the complete thread says the provider's logs matched the workflow and that Block saw no evidence of knowing participation.

This post is registered as evidence and has locally held capture artefacts. The original remains the canonical publication; hashes below identify the files held by this project.

How to check this yourself

The SHA-256 prefixes above identify each held copy without turning this page into a mirror of somebody else's post. Compare a quotation against the original. If the post has since been edited or deleted, ask and the held copy can be produced.