COLDCARD RNG incident the public record, collected and explained
Informational only, and this site never asks for your seed words. details

Informational only. This is an open source collection of what others have published about the incident, together with an explanation of it. It is not financial, security or legal advice, and not a substitute for professional advice about your own situation. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or speaking for Coinkite. Material is attributed and quoted as published; where sources disagree their scenarios are kept separate with their assumptions rather than reconciled into one answer. Everything is meant to be checked against the linked evidence rather than taken on trust. Act on your own judgement about a particular situation. Editorial standards and corrections.

Do not disclose recovery material to a website, form, message or support account. This site never asks for it, and contributions containing recovery words or private keys are not accepted.

Vendor declines to estimate losses, per Bloomberg

cointelegraph-2085597045734203509

https://x.com/cointelegraph/status/2085597045734203509

Captured screenshot of the post by @cointelegraph, posted 7 Aug 2026, 05:20 UTC
@cointelegraph posted captured full-size capture → original post →
Author
@cointelegraph
Organisation
independent
Evidence role
social statement
Posted
Capture status
capture held

A trade-press wire item reporting, from Bloomberg, that Coinkite says it is working on a post-mortem of the days-long attack rather than speculating on the extent of customer losses. It is secondary twice over, an outlet relaying another outlet, and the underlying Bloomberg report is not held here. Kept because it records a dated vendor position on the loss figure itself, which matters given the competing totals this record holds from chain monitors, and because it marks the point at which the incident was being covered by general financial press rather than Bitcoin media alone. The quoted vendor statement reaches this record at two removes and is not verified here.

This post is registered as evidence and has a locally held capture. The original remains the canonical publication.

How to check this yourself

Compare the screenshot or a quotation against the original while it is available.