COLDCARD RNG incident the public record, collected and explained
Informational only, and this site never asks for your seed words. details

Informational only. This is an open source collection of what others have published about the incident, together with an explanation of it. It is not financial, security or legal advice, and not a substitute for professional advice about your own situation. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or speaking for Coinkite. Material is attributed and quoted as published; where sources disagree their scenarios are kept separate with their assumptions rather than reconciled into one answer. Everything is meant to be checked against the linked evidence rather than taken on trust. Act on your own judgement about a particular situation. Editorial standards and corrections.

Do not disclose recovery material to a website, form, message or support account. This site never asks for it, and contributions containing recovery words or private keys are not accepted.

Cz_binance 2084531849515131231

cz_binance-2084531849515131231

https://x.com/cz_binance/status/2084531849515131231

Captured screenshot of the post by @cz_binance, posted 4 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC
@cz_binance posted captured full-size capture → original post →
Author
@cz_binance
Organisation
independent
Evidence role
social statement
Posted
Capture status
capture held

CZ argues that losses on the self-custody side are underreported and that custody choices have different risk profiles, while noting exchanges including Binance have covered some losses. A custody-policy opinion with an obvious commercial conflict.

This post is registered as evidence and has a locally held capture. The original remains the canonical publication.

How to check this yourself

Compare the screenshot or a quotation against the original while it is available.