COLDCARD RNG incident the public record, collected and explained
Informational only, and this site never asks for your seed words. details

Informational only. This is an open source collection of what others have published about the incident, together with an explanation of it. It is not financial, security or legal advice, and not a substitute for professional advice about your own situation. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or speaking for Coinkite. Material is attributed and quoted as published; where sources disagree their scenarios are kept separate with their assumptions rather than reconciled into one answer. Everything is meant to be checked against the linked evidence rather than taken on trust. Act on your own judgement about a particular situation. Editorial standards and corrections.

Do not disclose recovery material to a website, form, message or support account. This site never asks for it, and contributions containing recovery words or private keys are not accepted.

Loss profile dominated by sub-1 BTC addresses in count

glxy-loss-profile-self-custody

https://x.com/glxyresearch/status/2083207444906299851

Captured screenshot of the post by @glxyresearch, posted 31 Jul 2026, 15:05 UTC
@glxyresearch posted captured full-size capture → original post →
Author
@glxyresearch
Organisation
Galaxy Research
Evidence role
social statement
Posted
Capture status
capture held

Galaxy Research states that the loss profile is dominated by sub-1 BTC addresses in count but by 1-50 BTC addresses in value, and that this shape matches individual self-custody rather than institutional or exchange holdings. Held as a reported characterisation of the affected wallet population.

This post is registered as evidence and has a locally held capture. The original remains the canonical publication.

How to check this yourself

Compare the screenshot or a quotation against the original while it is available.