Draft article on the libngu contributor
hodlonaut-2084988860598042655
- Author
- @hodlonaut
- Organisation
- independent
- Evidence role
- social statement
- Posted
- 5 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC
- Capture status
- capture held
One line of text, "Working on a new article", over a screenshot of a draft section headed "Part III: switck". The excerpt makes an identity allegation against a named Coinkite officer, holding that the pseudonymous account behind the libngu library is that person, citing GPG-signature matching attributed to a bitcoin developer, and reading an October 2020 pull request in which two accounts exchanged messages eight minutes apart as one person granting himself permission so that libngu would appear to have arrived as an outside contribution. The record already holds that attribution, unverified and not adopted, at jamesob-2084620229389197453 and dylanleclair1-switck-key-attribution; this entry preserves the form in which it was being worked into a longer narrative for a general audience. Only the screenshot of the excerpt is held here, not the article. The identity claim and the inference drawn from the pull request are the author's own and are not verified here.
This post is registered as evidence and has a locally held capture. The original remains the canonical publication. Last checked .
This post is held twice: here, with this project's own note on why it matters, and again as part of the conversation captured at , which is polled for changes. Both copies are the same post; neither is a separate event.
Snapshot and diff bodies for this chain monitor are held in the local evidence archive but withheld from the public site because they can contain the addresses of people who published nothing themselves. Capture times and reviewed change summaries remain available below.
Held captures
0 presentation-noise differences. Sidebar, ticker and other page chrome churn that our review classified as not being changes to what the source says.
The excerpts and plain unified diffs above show the text this project held and how it changed. To verify a quotation, compare it against the page itself or against the Internet Archive's copies, which are independent of this project.
Complete captures are held offline rather than mirrored here, so this page shows diffs and excerpts. If a quotation is ever disputed, the full copy can be produced. Ask.
Compare the screenshot or a quotation against the original while it is available.