Recipient's public rejection of two red-team findings
jwweatherman_-2085427379116167369
- Author
- @jwweatherman_
- Organisation
- independent
- Evidence role
- social statement
- Posted
- 6 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC
- Capture status
- capture held
Replying to a request from Rob Hamilton to check direct messages, JW Weatherman says the two issues reported to him as critical now need to be addressed publicly and calls this not responsible disclosure. He then answers both: that his project does not verify signatures on Bitcoin Core, which he says is almost certainly untrue, is being checked, and would be like a missing second seatbelt given that downloads come from bitcoincore.org with implicit signatures and TLS; and that it downloads from GitHub, which he calls obviously not an issue. He writes as "we" for a project the post does not name. Held because it is a named recipient's first-hand account of being on the receiving end of the AI-assisted red-team sweep, and because it is one of the few captured disputes over the sweep's disclosure practice rather than its output. Both the findings and his rebuttal of them are the parties' own statements; neither is verified here.
This post is registered as evidence and has a locally held capture. The original remains the canonical publication. Last checked .
This post is held twice: here, with this project's own note on why it matters, and again as part of the conversation captured at , which is polled for changes. Both copies are the same post; neither is a separate event.
Snapshot and diff bodies for this chain monitor are held in the local evidence archive but withheld from the public site because they can contain the addresses of people who published nothing themselves. Capture times and reviewed change summaries remain available below.
Held captures
0 presentation-noise differences. Sidebar, ticker and other page chrome churn that our review classified as not being changes to what the source says.
The excerpts and plain unified diffs above show the text this project held and how it changed. To verify a quotation, compare it against the page itself or against the Internet Archive's copies, which are independent of this project.
Complete captures are held offline rather than mirrored here, so this page shows diffs and excerpts. If a quotation is ever disputed, the full copy can be produced. Ask.
Compare the screenshot or a quotation against the original while it is available.