L0lal33tz 2085154479423307782
l0lal33tz-2085154479423307782
- Author
- @L0laL33tz
- Organisation
- independent
- Evidence role
- commentary
- Posted
- 6 Aug 2026, 00:02 UTC
- Capture status
- capture held
L0la L33tz's objection to reading a chain trace as attribution: any intermediary hop may be an ordinary peer-to-peer transfer, so following the money can lead investigators to people who simply bought coins from a stranger. She adds that she doubts a thief at this scale would deposit at a centralized exchange, while hoping for victims' sake that one did. A direct methodological criticism of the typology at chainalysis-2085126271042830608, which the post quotes.
This post is registered as evidence and has a locally held capture. The original remains the canonical publication. Last checked .
This post is held twice: here, with this project's own note on why it matters, and again as part of the conversation captured at , which is polled for changes. Both copies are the same post; neither is a separate event.
Snapshot and diff bodies for this chain monitor are held in the local evidence archive but withheld from the public site because they can contain the addresses of people who published nothing themselves. Capture times and reviewed change summaries remain available below.
Held captures
0 presentation-noise differences. Sidebar, ticker and other page chrome churn that our review classified as not being changes to what the source says.
The excerpts and plain unified diffs above show the text this project held and how it changed. To verify a quotation, compare it against the page itself or against the Internet Archive's copies, which are independent of this project.
Complete captures are held offline rather than mirrored here, so this page shows diffs and excerpts. If a quotation is ever disputed, the full copy can be produced. Ask.
Compare the screenshot or a quotation against the original while it is available.