Prior audit-prompt failure analysis
llfourn-prior-prompt-analysis
- Author
- @LLFOURN
- Organisation
- independent
- Evidence role
- ai-security-response
- Posted
- 2 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC
- Capture status
- capture held
LLFOURN's reading of the 17 June pre-incident audit prompt by @utxoclub: it failed to surface the defect, which he attributes to the model tier available to that account at the time and to the firmware's submodule structure. The characterisations are the author's own.
This post is registered as evidence and has a locally held capture. The original remains the canonical publication. Last checked .
This post is held twice: here, with this project's own note on why it matters, and again as part of the conversation captured at , which is polled for changes. Both copies are the same post; neither is a separate event.
Snapshot and diff bodies for this chain monitor are held in the local evidence archive but withheld from the public site because they can contain the addresses of people who published nothing themselves. Capture times and reviewed change summaries remain available below.
Held captures
0 presentation-noise differences. Sidebar, ticker and other page chrome churn that our review classified as not being changes to what the source says.
The excerpts and plain unified diffs above show the text this project held and how it changed. To verify a quotation, compare it against the page itself or against the Internet Archive's copies, which are independent of this project.
Complete captures are held offline rather than mirrored here, so this page shows diffs and excerpts. If a quotation is ever disputed, the full copy can be produced. Ask.
Compare the screenshot or a quotation against the original while it is available.