US models versus Chinese open-weights models

Quote-posts calle's claim, held at callebtc-2085329159094489183, that not a single vulnerability in this wave was found by a US frontier model and that roughly $10k a day is going to open-weights models such as Kimi K3 and Qwen 3.8, and adds that US model makers publicise their models breaking into systems while defenders of core open-source infrastructure in a trillion-dollar asset ecosystem have to rely on Chinese models. It tags a US technology-policy official, which makes it an attempt to put the incident's AI-review story in front of policymakers rather than only the Bitcoin audience. Interest: the poster is the chief executive of Casa, a multi-key custody provider that published its own incident guidance, held at casa-incident-guidance. The claim about which models produced findings originates with calle and is not verified here.