COLDCARD RNG incident the public record, collected and explained
Informational only, and this site never asks for your seed words. details

Informational only. This is an open source collection of what others have published about the incident, together with an explanation of it. It is not financial, security or legal advice, and not a substitute for professional advice about your own situation. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or speaking for Coinkite. Material is attributed and quoted as published; where sources disagree their scenarios are kept separate with their assumptions rather than reconciled into one answer. Everything is meant to be checked against the linked evidence rather than taken on trust. Act on your own judgement about a particular situation. Editorial standards and corrections.

Do not disclose recovery material to a website, form, message or support account. This site never asks for it, and contributions containing recovery words or private keys are not accepted.

Pavolrusnak 2084645616932606300

pavolrusnak-2084645616932606300

https://x.com/PavolRusnak/status/2084645616932606300

Captured screenshot of the post by @PavolRusnak, posted 4 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC
@PavolRusnak posted captured full-size capture → original post →
Author
@PavolRusnak
Organisation
independent
Evidence role
commentary
Posted
Capture status
capture held

Pavol Rusnak's long-form post arguing that toxic Bitcoin maximalism has failed, using the COLDCARD controversy as the occasion while explicitly setting aside his own prior conflicts with Coinkite's founder. Substantial community-reaction writing from a competing hardware wallet's co-founder, which is disclosed here because it bears on how the argument should be read. Opinion, and not a claim about the defect.

This post is registered as evidence and has a locally held capture. The original remains the canonical publication.

How to check this yourself

Compare the screenshot or a quotation against the original while it is available.