r/coldcard: suggestion that Coinkite AI-review code before shipping
reddit-ai-code-review-suggestion
https://www.reddit.com/r/coldcard/comments/1vbtwhb/a_thought_for_the_future/
- Organisation
- Evidence role
- Community discussion
- Published
- not established
- Source changes
- 0
- Detected differences
- 0
- Unreviewed
- 0
- Copies held
- 1
Every check is recorded, including checks that found no text change. A detected edit is therefore bounded between two checks. The publisher's exact save time is not observable from this record. Last checked .
This post is held twice: here, with this project's own note on why it matters, and again as part of the conversation captured at , which is polled for changes. Both copies are the same post; neither is a separate event.
Snapshot and diff bodies for this chain monitor are held in the local evidence archive but withheld from the public site because they can contain the addresses of people who published nothing themselves. Capture times and reviewed change summaries remain available below.
Held captures
-
Recovered from the Internet Archive rather than captured by this project. The row records that third-party provenance separately from captures made by this project.
What changed from the previous capture 0 lines
Extracted text as captured
post: 1vbtwhb author: Mission-Disaster-447 created_utc: 1785511173 title: A thought for the Future body: how about you let a local AI model (or multiple) check your code before you ship it. The Hackers are doing it too. Sure, an AI server is expensive, but I bet it beats the cost of a class action lawsuit. comment: p0w6ee4 parent: t3_1vbtwhb author: angelus97 created_utc: 1785511960 edited: false body: Their code is open source. You can go do this yourself if you want. comment: p0w7m6g parent: t3_1vbtwhb author: 0100000101101000 created_utc: 1785512273 edited: false body: Pretty sure Coinkite is going to be filing for bankruptcy soon comment: p0wmwl5 parent: t3_1vbtwhb author: AnthonyBTC created_utc: 1785516185 edited: false body: Their code is open source, so there's not much they can really do about people analyzing it. If people want to use AI to constantly search for attack vectors, they will. Coldcard just needs to continuously audit its open source code and address any issues that are found. But besides that, Coldcard will likely go bankrupt over this. For a hardware wallet company, this is an endgame situation. comment: p0wvb5w parent: t1_p0w7m6g author: Mission-Disaster-447 created_utc: 1785518348 edited: false body: that would be sad because I like their products. but i guess you may be right comment: p0y0ut7Excerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.
0 presentation-noise differences. Sidebar, ticker and other page chrome churn that our review classified as not being changes to what the source says.
The excerpts and plain unified diffs above show the text this project held and how it changed. To verify a quotation, compare it against the page itself or against the Internet Archive's copies, which are independent of this project.
Complete captures are held offline rather than mirrored here, so this page shows diffs and excerpts. If a quotation is ever disputed, the full copy can be produced. Ask.
Compare the screenshot or a quotation against the original while it is available.