r/coldcard: whether a COLDCARD Q remains safe in a multisig setup
reddit-ccq-multisig-safety
https://www.reddit.com/r/coldcard/comments/1vdlxgc/so_you_think_is_still_safe_to_use_the_ccq_for_a/
Latest reviewed change
source content difference between and
Reddit served 1 additional comment record(s); the diff preserves their text and any edits to existing records.
edited: false
body:
Sorry for being so fucking stupid. My bad.
+
+comment: p1ujwzq
+parent: t1_p1f1lud
+author: newMoneyStyle
+created_utc: 1785935021
First lines only. The complete diff is in the timeline below.
- Organisation
- Evidence role
- Community discussion
- Published
- not established
- Source changes
- 1
- Detected differences
- 1
- Unreviewed
- 0
- Copies held
- 2
Every check is recorded, including checks that found no text change. A detected edit is therefore bounded between two checks. The publisher's exact save time is not observable from this record. Last checked .
This post is held twice: here, with this project's own note on why it matters, and again as part of the conversation captured at , which is polled for changes. Both copies are the same post; neither is a separate event.
Snapshot and diff bodies for this chain monitor are held in the local evidence archive but withheld from the public site because they can contain the addresses of people who published nothing themselves. Capture times and reviewed change summaries remain available below.
Held captures
-
Reddit served 1 additional comment record(s); the diff preserves their text and any edits to existing records.
Recovered from the Internet Archive rather than captured by this project. The row records that third-party provenance separately from captures made by this project.
What changed from the previous capture 8 lines
edited: false body: Sorry for being so fucking stupid. My bad. + +comment: p1ujwzq +parent: t1_p1f1lud +author: newMoneyStyle +created_utc: 1785935021 +edited: false +body: +A honeypot basically means you set up a small wallet using just your seed words (no passphrase) with a tiny bit of BTC in it.Extracted text as captured
post: 1vdlxgc author: SmellyCummies created_utc: 1785686750 title: So you think is still safe to use the CCQ for a multi sig setup? body: I currently have a Ledger Nano X, a regular Blockstream Jade, and a Coldcard Q. I never actually set up the Jade or Coldcard yet because I'm lazy. Although, given recent events, maybe that worked out for me. I plan to do a multi-sig setup soon. Would it be fine to use these 3 hardware wallets for it? Or should I consider swapping out the CCQ and possibly the Ledger as well? What do you all recommend to use for a new multi-sig setup? comment: p19ykvh parent: t3_1vdlxgc author: Quirky-Reveal-1669 created_utc: 1785686884 edited: false body: If you generated the CCQ keys with dice, and used a proper passphrase for the wallet, absolutely. comment: p1a0cit parent: t1_p19ykvh author: SmellyCummies created_utc: 1785687366 edited: false body: I plan to use dice for sure. And I'll passphrase everything as well. comment: p1dnd2k parent: t1_p1a0cit author: 6thcoin created_utc: 1785727239 edited: false body: Make sure to max out your entropy with the passphrase. Also using a honey pot with your seed words without your passphrase is a good way to tell if your words are compromised. comment: p1f1lud parent: t1_p1dnd2k author: SmellyCummies created_utc: 1785751174 edited: falseExcerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.
-
Recovered from the Internet Archive rather than captured by this project. The row records that third-party provenance separately from captures made by this project.
What changed from the previous capture 0 lines
Extracted text as captured
post: 1vdlxgc author: SmellyCummies created_utc: 1785686750 title: So you think is still safe to use the CCQ for a multi sig setup? body: I currently have a Ledger Nano X, a regular Blockstream Jade, and a Coldcard Q. I never actually set up the Jade or Coldcard yet because I'm lazy. Although, given recent events, maybe that worked out for me. I plan to do a multi-sig setup soon. Would it be fine to use these 3 hardware wallets for it? Or should I consider swapping out the CCQ and possibly the Ledger as well? What do you all recommend to use for a new multi-sig setup? comment: p19ykvh parent: t3_1vdlxgc author: Quirky-Reveal-1669 created_utc: 1785686884 edited: false body: If you generated the CCQ keys with dice, and used a proper passphrase for the wallet, absolutely. comment: p1a0cit parent: t1_p19ykvh author: SmellyCummies created_utc: 1785687366 edited: false body: I plan to use dice for sure. And I'll passphrase everything as well. comment: p1dnd2k parent: t1_p1a0cit author: 6thcoin created_utc: 1785727239 edited: false body: Make sure to max out your entropy with the passphrase. Also using a honey pot with your seed words without your passphrase is a good way to tell if your words are compromised. comment: p1f1lud parent: t1_p1dnd2k author: SmellyCummies created_utc: 1785751174 edited: falseExcerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.
0 presentation-noise differences. Sidebar, ticker and other page chrome churn that our review classified as not being changes to what the source says.
The excerpts and plain unified diffs above show the text this project held and how it changed. To verify a quotation, compare it against the page itself or against the Internet Archive's copies, which are independent of this project.
Complete captures are held offline rather than mirrored here, so this page shows diffs and excerpts. If a quotation is ever disputed, the full copy can be produced. Ask.
Compare the screenshot or a quotation against the original while it is available.