COLDCARD RNG incident the public record, collected and explained
Informational only, and this site never asks for your seed words. details

Informational only. This is an open source collection of what others have published about the incident, together with an explanation of it. It is not financial, security or legal advice, and not a substitute for professional advice about your own situation. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or speaking for Coinkite. Material is attributed and quoted as published; where sources disagree their scenarios are kept separate with their assumptions rather than reconciled into one answer. Everything is meant to be checked against the linked evidence rather than taken on trust. Act on your own judgement about a particular situation. Editorial standards and corrections.

Do not disclose recovery material to a website, form, message or support account. This site never asks for it, and contributions containing recovery words or private keys are not accepted.

r/Bitcoin: reviewing the commits that introduced the entropy bug

reddit-entropy-bug-commits-review

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1vdycb4/coldcard_entropy_bug_the_commits_that_introduced/

Latest reviewed change

source content difference between and

Reddit no longer served a comment arguing that the commits showed shortcuts compared with the review process at the author's workplace.

seen +0 -8 full history below
 body:
 Like the Linux kernel 
 
-comment: p1dj4p1
-parent: t1_p1dgscs
-author: OldHamburger7923
-created_utc: 1785725606
-edited: false

First lines only. The complete diff is in the timeline below.

Organisation
reddit
Evidence role
Community discussion
Published
not established
Source changes
4
Detected differences
4
Unreviewed
0
Copies held
5

Every check is recorded, including checks that found no text change. A detected edit is therefore bounded between two checks. The publisher's exact save time is not observable from this record. Last checked .

  1. source content difference between and Current source content +0 -8

    Reddit no longer served a comment arguing that the commits showed shortcuts compared with the review process at the author's workplace.

    seen · Captured here 42,241 chars
    What changed from the previous capture 8 lines
     body:
     Like the Linux kernel 
     
    -comment: p1dj4p1
    -parent: t1_p1dgscs
    -author: OldHamburger7923
    -created_utc: 1785725606
    -edited: false
    -body:
    -it goes to show they were taking shortcuts. In my workplace, git is hooked into the feature tracker, your commit messages go into the release, release notes info, and is read by more than just your code reviewer.
    -
     comment: p1dlx6a
     parent: t1_p1dhn2p
     author: user_name_checks_out
    
    Extracted text as captured
    post: 1vdycb4
    author: DyehuthyTV
    created_utc: 1785717011
    title: Coldcard entropy bug: the commits that introduced it are worth reviewing
    body:
    Source → X (Tweet): [hodlonaut #BIP-110 on X: "The commits (code changes)..." / X](https://x.com/hodlonaut/status/2083885515229573203) 👀
    
    This is why people should learn to **VERIFY the things they consume**. No excuses!
    
    >"I am not a programmer, I don't understand code. How am I supposed to verify?"
    
    Learn! With Bitcoin, you are adopting a living standard of verifying everything: **understanding how things really work.**
    
    * Economics
    * Monetary system(fiat money)
    * Banking system
    * Investing & Saving
    * Software
    * Hardware
    * Information (facts vs noise)
    * Privacy
    * Cybersecurity
    * etc., etc.
    
    This living standard is not just for "paranoids." It is for people who like to do their own research and their own due diligence.
    
    **"Don't trust, verify" is not a slogan. It is a living standard!**
    
    **"With Bitcoin, you are your own bank."** Well, this is a huge responsibility! It is not a "game." You have to invest a lot of time into **security**, just like banks do.
    
    comment: p1czpje
    parent: t3_1vdycb4
    author: CheeseWeezel
    created_utc: 1785718716
    edited: false
    body:
    I've never heard of anyone comparing commit message length to the amount of code changes.
    
    Every production system I've ever worked on inevitably has an occasional "WIP", "Ugh", or "Crap" commit message - just how it works.
    

    Excerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.

  2. source content difference between and source content +14 -12

    An existing Reddit comment changed or its author account was deleted.

    seen · Captured here 42,560 chars
    What changed from the previous capture 26 lines
     parent: t1_p1pduwo
     author: DyehuthyTV
     created_utc: 1785870947
    -edited: false
    -body:
    - Have you ever read a PR in a big project? lol xD  
    -  
    -Example, from Bitcoin Core (Node) repo on Github: [Pull requests · bitcoin/bitcoin](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls) 👀 
    +edited: 1785871211
    +body:
    +Have you ever read a PR in a big project? lol xD
    +
    +Example, from Bitcoin Core (Node) repo on Github: [Pull requests · bitcoin/bitcoin](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls) (Github Link) 👀
     
     Commit: <type/scope (dir)>: <description> 👇🏻
     
     
     You cant put a commits like this 👇🏻
     
    -`Windows` or `Crap`  
    -  
    -xD lol, is non-professional 
    -
    -Plus a comment explaining the the reason (bug, fix, error, typo, etc) and the logic of your PR.
    -
    -Read the CONTRIBUTING file, before talking about it lol
    +`Windows` or `Crap`
    +
    +xD lol, is non-professional
    +
    +Plus a comment explaining the reason (bug, fix, error, typo, etc) and the logic of your PR.
    +
    +**There is much more descriptive content (commits + comments) in a PR than people who have never worked as developers believe ;)**
    +
    +**Read the CONTRIBUTING file, before talking about it lol**
    
    Extracted text as captured
    post: 1vdycb4
    author: DyehuthyTV
    created_utc: 1785717011
    title: Coldcard entropy bug: the commits that introduced it are worth reviewing
    body:
    Source → X (Tweet): [hodlonaut #BIP-110 on X: "The commits (code changes)..." / X](https://x.com/hodlonaut/status/2083885515229573203) 👀
    
    This is why people should learn to **VERIFY the things they consume**. No excuses!
    
    >"I am not a programmer, I don't understand code. How am I supposed to verify?"
    
    Learn! With Bitcoin, you are adopting a living standard of verifying everything: **understanding how things really work.**
    
    * Economics
    * Monetary system(fiat money)
    * Banking system
    * Investing & Saving
    * Software
    * Hardware
    * Information (facts vs noise)
    * Privacy
    * Cybersecurity
    * etc., etc.
    
    This living standard is not just for "paranoids." It is for people who like to do their own research and their own due diligence.
    
    **"Don't trust, verify" is not a slogan. It is a living standard!**
    
    **"With Bitcoin, you are your own bank."** Well, this is a huge responsibility! It is not a "game." You have to invest a lot of time into **security**, just like banks do.
    
    comment: p1czpje
    parent: t3_1vdycb4
    author: CheeseWeezel
    created_utc: 1785718716
    edited: false
    body:
    I've never heard of anyone comparing commit message length to the amount of code changes.
    
    Every production system I've ever worked on inevitably has an occasional "WIP", "Ugh", or "Crap" commit message - just how it works.
    

    Excerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.

  3. source content difference between and source content +34 -0

    The Reddit thread gained 2 new comments.

    seen · Captured here 42,420 chars
    What changed from the previous capture 34 lines
     edited: false
     body:
     Most big names are all hat and no cattle. What exactly did he do to warrant that reverence?
    +
    +comment: p1pduwo
    +parent: t1_p1da4ay
    +author: magicmulder
    +created_utc: 1785869345
    +edited: false
    +body:
    +\> with that "squashing commits" approach, you will never make a "code change"
    +
    +No, that is literally how it works. The reviewer looks at your PR with its commits and commit messages, and once the PR is accepted, nobody ever sees those commits again because nobody wants 825 commit messages "fixed dumb bug from yesterday" from a single PR in the dev or main branch, that's just noise.
    +
    +comment: p1pk4cd
    +parent: t1_p1pduwo
    +author: DyehuthyTV
    +created_utc: 1785870947
    +edited: false
    +body:
    + Have you ever read a PR in a big project? lol xD  
    +  
    +Example, from Bitcoin Core (Node) repo on Github: [Pull requests · bitcoin/bitcoin](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls) 👀 
    +
    +Commit: <type/scope (dir)>: <description> 👇🏻
    +
    +`util: set os-level thread names on Windows- #number`
    +
    +You cant put a commits like this 👇🏻
    +
    +`Windows` or `Crap`  
    +  
    +xD lol, is non-professional 
    +
    +Plus a comment explaining the the reason (bug, fix, error, typo, etc) and the logic of your PR.
    +
    +Read the CONTRIBUTING file, before talking about it lol
    
    Extracted text as captured
    post: 1vdycb4
    author: DyehuthyTV
    created_utc: 1785717011
    title: Coldcard entropy bug: the commits that introduced it are worth reviewing
    body:
    Source → X (Tweet): [hodlonaut #BIP-110 on X: "The commits (code changes)..." / X](https://x.com/hodlonaut/status/2083885515229573203) 👀
    
    This is why people should learn to **VERIFY the things they consume**. No excuses!
    
    >"I am not a programmer, I don't understand code. How am I supposed to verify?"
    
    Learn! With Bitcoin, you are adopting a living standard of verifying everything: **understanding how things really work.**
    
    * Economics
    * Monetary system(fiat money)
    * Banking system
    * Investing & Saving
    * Software
    * Hardware
    * Information (facts vs noise)
    * Privacy
    * Cybersecurity
    * etc., etc.
    
    This living standard is not just for "paranoids." It is for people who like to do their own research and their own due diligence.
    
    **"Don't trust, verify" is not a slogan. It is a living standard!**
    
    **"With Bitcoin, you are your own bank."** Well, this is a huge responsibility! It is not a "game." You have to invest a lot of time into **security**, just like banks do.
    
    comment: p1czpje
    parent: t3_1vdycb4
    author: CheeseWeezel
    created_utc: 1785718716
    edited: false
    body:
    I've never heard of anyone comparing commit message length to the amount of code changes.
    
    Every production system I've ever worked on inevitably has an occasional "WIP", "Ugh", or "Crap" commit message - just how it works.
    

    Excerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.

  4. source content difference between and source content +8 -0

    The Reddit thread gained 1 new comment.

    seen · Captured here 41,297 chars
    What changed from the previous capture 8 lines
     edited: false
     body:
     That whole text reads like AI. It couldn't even get to right number of letters in the word "runs" correct. 
    +
    +comment: p1pd7ia
    +parent: t1_p1dvgjl
    +author: magicmulder
    +created_utc: 1785869183
    +edited: false
    +body:
    +Most big names are all hat and no cattle. What exactly did he do to warrant that reverence?
    
    Extracted text as captured
    post: 1vdycb4
    author: DyehuthyTV
    created_utc: 1785717011
    title: Coldcard entropy bug: the commits that introduced it are worth reviewing
    body:
    Source → X (Tweet): [hodlonaut #BIP-110 on X: "The commits (code changes)..." / X](https://x.com/hodlonaut/status/2083885515229573203) 👀
    
    This is why people should learn to **VERIFY the things they consume**. No excuses!
    
    >"I am not a programmer, I don't understand code. How am I supposed to verify?"
    
    Learn! With Bitcoin, you are adopting a living standard of verifying everything: **understanding how things really work.**
    
    * Economics
    * Monetary system(fiat money)
    * Banking system
    * Investing & Saving
    * Software
    * Hardware
    * Information (facts vs noise)
    * Privacy
    * Cybersecurity
    * etc., etc.
    
    This living standard is not just for "paranoids." It is for people who like to do their own research and their own due diligence.
    
    **"Don't trust, verify" is not a slogan. It is a living standard!**
    
    **"With Bitcoin, you are your own bank."** Well, this is a huge responsibility! It is not a "game." You have to invest a lot of time into **security**, just like banks do.
    
    comment: p1czpje
    parent: t3_1vdycb4
    author: CheeseWeezel
    created_utc: 1785718716
    edited: false
    body:
    I've never heard of anyone comparing commit message length to the amount of code changes.
    
    Every production system I've ever worked on inevitably has an occasional "WIP", "Ugh", or "Crap" commit message - just how it works.
    

    Excerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.

  5. Earliest copy held
    seen · Captured here 41,104 chars
    Extracted text as captured
    post: 1vdycb4
    author: DyehuthyTV
    created_utc: 1785717011
    title: Coldcard entropy bug: the commits that introduced it are worth reviewing
    body:
    Source → X (Tweet): [hodlonaut #BIP-110 on X: "The commits (code changes)..." / X](https://x.com/hodlonaut/status/2083885515229573203) 👀
    
    This is why people should learn to **VERIFY the things they consume**. No excuses!
    
    >"I am not a programmer, I don't understand code. How am I supposed to verify?"
    
    Learn! With Bitcoin, you are adopting a living standard of verifying everything: **understanding how things really work.**
    
    * Economics
    * Monetary system(fiat money)
    * Banking system
    * Investing & Saving
    * Software
    * Hardware
    * Information (facts vs noise)
    * Privacy
    * Cybersecurity
    * etc., etc.
    
    This living standard is not just for "paranoids." It is for people who like to do their own research and their own due diligence.
    
    **"Don't trust, verify" is not a slogan. It is a living standard!**
    
    **"With Bitcoin, you are your own bank."** Well, this is a huge responsibility! It is not a "game." You have to invest a lot of time into **security**, just like banks do.
    
    comment: p1czpje
    parent: t3_1vdycb4
    author: CheeseWeezel
    created_utc: 1785718716
    edited: false
    body:
    I've never heard of anyone comparing commit message length to the amount of code changes.
    
    Every production system I've ever worked on inevitably has an occasional "WIP", "Ugh", or "Crap" commit message - just how it works.
    

    Excerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.

How to check this yourself

The excerpts and plain unified diffs above show the text this project held and how it changed. To verify a quotation, compare it against the page itself or against the Internet Archive's copies, which are independent of this project.

Complete captures are held offline rather than mirrored here, so this page shows diffs and excerpts. If a quotation is ever disputed, the full copy can be produced. Ask.