COLDCARD RNG incident the public record, collected and explained
Informational only, and this site never asks for your seed words. details

Informational only. This is an open source collection of what others have published about the incident, together with an explanation of it. It is not financial, security or legal advice, and not a substitute for professional advice about your own situation. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or speaking for Coinkite. Material is attributed and quoted as published; where sources disagree their scenarios are kept separate with their assumptions rather than reconciled into one answer. Everything is meant to be checked against the linked evidence rather than taken on trust. Act on your own judgement about a particular situation. Editorial standards and corrections.

Do not disclose recovery material to a website, form, message or support account. This site never asks for it, and contributions containing recovery words or private keys are not accepted.

r/Bitcoin: owner struggling to weigh self-custody risk after the attack

reddit-self-custody-risk-doubt

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1veuylf/im_having_a_hard_time_grasping_the_risk_involved/

Latest reviewed change

source content difference between and

Reddit served 1 additional comment record(s); the diff preserves their text and any edits to existing records.

seen +8 -0 full history below
 edited: false
 body:
 Why ? They are insured
+
+comment: p1z4vom
+parent: t3_1veuylf
+author: MakeItMine2024
+created_utc: 1785980427

First lines only. The complete diff is in the timeline below.

Organisation
reddit
Evidence role
Community discussion
Published
not established
Source changes
5
Detected differences
5
Unreviewed
0
Copies held
6

Every check is recorded, including checks that found no text change. A detected edit is therefore bounded between two checks. The publisher's exact save time is not observable from this record. Last checked .

  1. source content difference between and Current source content +8 -0

    Reddit served 1 additional comment record(s); the diff preserves their text and any edits to existing records.

    seen · Captured here 5,122 chars
    What changed from the previous capture 8 lines
     edited: false
     body:
     Why ? They are insured
    +
    +comment: p1z4vom
    +parent: t3_1veuylf
    +author: MakeItMine2024
    +created_utc: 1785980427
    +edited: false
    +body:
    +Thank you all the insight, after further investigation my Trezor with a paraphrase is solid 
    
    Extracted text as captured
    post: 1veuylf
    author: MakeItMine2024
    created_utc: 1785803324
    title: I’m having a hard time grasping the risk involved with BTC and self custody
    body:
    I have a Trezor and have been a big fan of Bitcoin and self custody after learning a lesson with a hot wallet in 2023 losing the equivalent of 1.3 BTC at the time. It’s just not safe unless you put your BTC into Robinhood that insures against you positions as they own it you just have a position in BTC once you transfer it to them. The most recent cold wallet attack is completely like the others and eventually will get linked to North Korea.. 
    
    comment: p1k32lf
    parent: t3_1veuylf
    author: Adrima_the_DK
    created_utc: 1785803829
    edited: false
    body:
    Think of it this way
    Also having a lot.of fiat currency in your custody is risky as it could be stolen.
    
    I would recommend splitting your Bitcoin into different wallets so you mitigate the risks. Do your own research and see the trusted wallets in the market.
    
    comment: p1k3lze
    parent: t3_1veuylf
    author: Prior-Book5312
    created_utc: 1785804006
    edited: false
    body:
    No. There's good reason why Satoshi's keys, despite having no hardware wallet, have never been hacked and it's because of this video from BPI, which explains in detail the difference between Bitcoin's entropy and what the Coldcard actually did:
    
    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM)
    
    You can upgrade your Trezor's security with a passphrase, and eventually maybe consider a Multisig solution. But you're fine for now. 
    
    Don't act like a cow that just runs where the herd goes because there was a bang.
    
    comment: p1km6bk
    parent: t1_p1k32lf
    author: heretilimnot3
    created_utc: 1785810156
    edited: false
    body:
    Lol
    

    Excerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.

  2. source content difference between and source content +8 -0

    Reddit served 1 additional comment record(s); the diff preserves their text and any edits to existing records.

    seen · Captured here 4,925 chars
    What changed from the previous capture 8 lines
     edited: false
     body:
     Even then, thief would actually have to break into your house. With Bitcoin they might as well steal it from a whole different continent.
    +
    +comment: p1tc5s3
    +parent: t1_p1mhppv
    +author: MakeItMine2024
    +created_utc: 1785917383
    +edited: false
    +body:
    +Why ? They are insured
    
    Extracted text as captured
    post: 1veuylf
    author: MakeItMine2024
    created_utc: 1785803324
    title: I’m having a hard time grasping the risk involved with BTC and self custody
    body:
    I have a Trezor and have been a big fan of Bitcoin and self custody after learning a lesson with a hot wallet in 2023 losing the equivalent of 1.3 BTC at the time. It’s just not safe unless you put your BTC into Robinhood that insures against you positions as they own it you just have a position in BTC once you transfer it to them. The most recent cold wallet attack is completely like the others and eventually will get linked to North Korea.. 
    
    comment: p1k32lf
    parent: t3_1veuylf
    author: Adrima_the_DK
    created_utc: 1785803829
    edited: false
    body:
    Think of it this way
    Also having a lot.of fiat currency in your custody is risky as it could be stolen.
    
    I would recommend splitting your Bitcoin into different wallets so you mitigate the risks. Do your own research and see the trusted wallets in the market.
    
    comment: p1k3lze
    parent: t3_1veuylf
    author: Prior-Book5312
    created_utc: 1785804006
    edited: false
    body:
    No. There's good reason why Satoshi's keys, despite having no hardware wallet, have never been hacked and it's because of this video from BPI, which explains in detail the difference between Bitcoin's entropy and what the Coldcard actually did:
    
    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM)
    
    You can upgrade your Trezor's security with a passphrase, and eventually maybe consider a Multisig solution. But you're fine for now. 
    
    Don't act like a cow that just runs where the herd goes because there was a bang.
    
    comment: p1km6bk
    parent: t1_p1k32lf
    author: heretilimnot3
    created_utc: 1785810156
    edited: false
    body:
    Lol
    

    Excerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.

  3. source content difference between and source content +8 -0

    The Reddit thread gained 1 new comment.

    seen · Captured here 4,798 chars
    What changed from the previous capture 8 lines
     edited: false
     body:
     Satoshi's keys were before the seed phrase was a think. It's just a long private key. There were no words back then
    +
    +comment: p1p6n8q
    +parent: t1_p1l606d
    +author: junkhead_7
    +created_utc: 1785867542
    +edited: false
    +body:
    +Even then, thief would actually have to break into your house. With Bitcoin they might as well steal it from a whole different continent.
    
    Extracted text as captured
    post: 1veuylf
    author: MakeItMine2024
    created_utc: 1785803324
    title: I’m having a hard time grasping the risk involved with BTC and self custody
    body:
    I have a Trezor and have been a big fan of Bitcoin and self custody after learning a lesson with a hot wallet in 2023 losing the equivalent of 1.3 BTC at the time. It’s just not safe unless you put your BTC into Robinhood that insures against you positions as they own it you just have a position in BTC once you transfer it to them. The most recent cold wallet attack is completely like the others and eventually will get linked to North Korea.. 
    
    comment: p1k32lf
    parent: t3_1veuylf
    author: Adrima_the_DK
    created_utc: 1785803829
    edited: false
    body:
    Think of it this way
    Also having a lot.of fiat currency in your custody is risky as it could be stolen.
    
    I would recommend splitting your Bitcoin into different wallets so you mitigate the risks. Do your own research and see the trusted wallets in the market.
    
    comment: p1k3lze
    parent: t3_1veuylf
    author: Prior-Book5312
    created_utc: 1785804006
    edited: false
    body:
    No. There's good reason why Satoshi's keys, despite having no hardware wallet, have never been hacked and it's because of this video from BPI, which explains in detail the difference between Bitcoin's entropy and what the Coldcard actually did:
    
    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM)
    
    You can upgrade your Trezor's security with a passphrase, and eventually maybe consider a Multisig solution. But you're fine for now. 
    
    Don't act like a cow that just runs where the herd goes because there was a bang.
    
    comment: p1km6bk
    parent: t1_p1k32lf
    author: heretilimnot3
    created_utc: 1785810156
    edited: false
    body:
    Lol
    

    Excerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.

  4. source content difference between and source content +16 -0

    Two new comments were posted by JunketTurbulent2114: citing Mt. Gox as the opposite lesson for older users, and noting Satoshi's keys predate seed phrases and were just long private keys.

    seen · Captured here 4,560 chars
    What changed from the previous capture 16 lines
     edited: false
     body:
     Putting your BTC into Robin Hood is not safe
    +
    +comment: p1mkioh
    +parent: t3_1veuylf
    +author: JunketTurbulent2114
    +created_utc: 1785841277
    +edited: false
    +body:
    +So the lesson for older users was the exact opposite.  Ask Mt. Gox.
    +
    +comment: p1mkoo9
    +parent: t1_p1kx2qd
    +author: JunketTurbulent2114
    +created_utc: 1785841345
    +edited: false
    +body:
    +Satoshi's keys were before the seed phrase was a think. It's just a long private key. There were no words back then
    
    Extracted text as captured
    post: 1veuylf
    author: MakeItMine2024
    created_utc: 1785803324
    title: I’m having a hard time grasping the risk involved with BTC and self custody
    body:
    I have a Trezor and have been a big fan of Bitcoin and self custody after learning a lesson with a hot wallet in 2023 losing the equivalent of 1.3 BTC at the time. It’s just not safe unless you put your BTC into Robinhood that insures against you positions as they own it you just have a position in BTC once you transfer it to them. The most recent cold wallet attack is completely like the others and eventually will get linked to North Korea.. 
    
    comment: p1k32lf
    parent: t3_1veuylf
    author: Adrima_the_DK
    created_utc: 1785803829
    edited: false
    body:
    Think of it this way
    Also having a lot.of fiat currency in your custody is risky as it could be stolen.
    
    I would recommend splitting your Bitcoin into different wallets so you mitigate the risks. Do your own research and see the trusted wallets in the market.
    
    comment: p1k3lze
    parent: t3_1veuylf
    author: Prior-Book5312
    created_utc: 1785804006
    edited: false
    body:
    No. There's good reason why Satoshi's keys, despite having no hardware wallet, have never been hacked and it's because of this video from BPI, which explains in detail the difference between Bitcoin's entropy and what the Coldcard actually did:
    
    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM)
    
    You can upgrade your Trezor's security with a passphrase, and eventually maybe consider a Multisig solution. But you're fine for now. 
    
    Don't act like a cow that just runs where the herd goes because there was a bang.
    
    comment: p1km6bk
    parent: t1_p1k32lf
    author: heretilimnot3
    created_utc: 1785810156
    edited: false
    body:
    Lol
    

    Excerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.

  5. source content difference between and source content +8 -0

    One new comment was posted: Disavowed_Rogue ('Putting your BTC into Robin Hood is not safe').

    seen · Captured here 4,158 chars
    What changed from the previous capture 8 lines
     edited: false
     body:
     The risk of fiat currency is loss of value due to inflation. Dollars in a FDIC insured account are quite safe from theft. A better analogy would be gold coins that you keep in a home safe.
    +
    +comment: p1mhppv
    +parent: t3_1veuylf
    +author: Disavowed_Rogue
    +created_utc: 1785840126
    +edited: false
    +body:
    +Putting your BTC into Robin Hood is not safe
    
    Extracted text as captured
    post: 1veuylf
    author: MakeItMine2024
    created_utc: 1785803324
    title: I’m having a hard time grasping the risk involved with BTC and self custody
    body:
    I have a Trezor and have been a big fan of Bitcoin and self custody after learning a lesson with a hot wallet in 2023 losing the equivalent of 1.3 BTC at the time. It’s just not safe unless you put your BTC into Robinhood that insures against you positions as they own it you just have a position in BTC once you transfer it to them. The most recent cold wallet attack is completely like the others and eventually will get linked to North Korea.. 
    
    comment: p1k32lf
    parent: t3_1veuylf
    author: Adrima_the_DK
    created_utc: 1785803829
    edited: false
    body:
    Think of it this way
    Also having a lot.of fiat currency in your custody is risky as it could be stolen.
    
    I would recommend splitting your Bitcoin into different wallets so you mitigate the risks. Do your own research and see the trusted wallets in the market.
    
    comment: p1k3lze
    parent: t3_1veuylf
    author: Prior-Book5312
    created_utc: 1785804006
    edited: false
    body:
    No. There's good reason why Satoshi's keys, despite having no hardware wallet, have never been hacked and it's because of this video from BPI, which explains in detail the difference between Bitcoin's entropy and what the Coldcard actually did:
    
    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM)
    
    You can upgrade your Trezor's security with a passphrase, and eventually maybe consider a Multisig solution. But you're fine for now. 
    
    Don't act like a cow that just runs where the herd goes because there was a bang.
    
    comment: p1km6bk
    parent: t1_p1k32lf
    author: heretilimnot3
    created_utc: 1785810156
    edited: false
    body:
    Lol
    

    Excerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.

  6. Earliest copy held
    seen · Captured here 4,008 chars
    Extracted text as captured
    post: 1veuylf
    author: MakeItMine2024
    created_utc: 1785803324
    title: I’m having a hard time grasping the risk involved with BTC and self custody
    body:
    I have a Trezor and have been a big fan of Bitcoin and self custody after learning a lesson with a hot wallet in 2023 losing the equivalent of 1.3 BTC at the time. It’s just not safe unless you put your BTC into Robinhood that insures against you positions as they own it you just have a position in BTC once you transfer it to them. The most recent cold wallet attack is completely like the others and eventually will get linked to North Korea.. 
    
    comment: p1k32lf
    parent: t3_1veuylf
    author: Adrima_the_DK
    created_utc: 1785803829
    edited: false
    body:
    Think of it this way
    Also having a lot.of fiat currency in your custody is risky as it could be stolen.
    
    I would recommend splitting your Bitcoin into different wallets so you mitigate the risks. Do your own research and see the trusted wallets in the market.
    
    comment: p1k3lze
    parent: t3_1veuylf
    author: Prior-Book5312
    created_utc: 1785804006
    edited: false
    body:
    No. There's good reason why Satoshi's keys, despite having no hardware wallet, have never been hacked and it's because of this video from BPI, which explains in detail the difference between Bitcoin's entropy and what the Coldcard actually did:
    
    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM)
    
    You can upgrade your Trezor's security with a passphrase, and eventually maybe consider a Multisig solution. But you're fine for now. 
    
    Don't act like a cow that just runs where the herd goes because there was a bang.
    
    comment: p1km6bk
    parent: t1_p1k32lf
    author: heretilimnot3
    created_utc: 1785810156
    edited: false
    body:
    Lol
    

    Excerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.

How to check this yourself

The excerpts and plain unified diffs above show the text this project held and how it changed. To verify a quotation, compare it against the page itself or against the Internet Archive's copies, which are independent of this project.

Complete captures are held offline rather than mirrored here, so this page shows diffs and excerpts. If a quotation is ever disputed, the full copy can be produced. Ask.