r/Bitcoin: owner struggling to weigh self-custody risk after the attack
reddit-self-custody-risk-doubt
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1veuylf/im_having_a_hard_time_grasping_the_risk_involved/
Latest reviewed change
source content difference between and
Reddit served 1 additional comment record(s); the diff preserves their text and any edits to existing records.
edited: false
body:
Why ? They are insured
+
+comment: p1z4vom
+parent: t3_1veuylf
+author: MakeItMine2024
+created_utc: 1785980427
First lines only. The complete diff is in the timeline below.
- Organisation
- Evidence role
- Community discussion
- Published
- not established
- Source changes
- 5
- Detected differences
- 5
- Unreviewed
- 0
- Copies held
- 6
Every check is recorded, including checks that found no text change. A detected edit is therefore bounded between two checks. The publisher's exact save time is not observable from this record. Last checked .
This post is held twice: here, with this project's own note on why it matters, and again as part of the conversation captured at , which is polled for changes. Both copies are the same post; neither is a separate event.
Snapshot and diff bodies for this chain monitor are held in the local evidence archive but withheld from the public site because they can contain the addresses of people who published nothing themselves. Capture times and reviewed change summaries remain available below.
Held captures
-
Reddit served 1 additional comment record(s); the diff preserves their text and any edits to existing records.
Recovered from the Internet Archive rather than captured by this project. The row records that third-party provenance separately from captures made by this project.
What changed from the previous capture 8 lines
edited: false body: Why ? They are insured + +comment: p1z4vom +parent: t3_1veuylf +author: MakeItMine2024 +created_utc: 1785980427 +edited: false +body: +Thank you all the insight, after further investigation my Trezor with a paraphrase is solidExtracted text as captured
post: 1veuylf author: MakeItMine2024 created_utc: 1785803324 title: I’m having a hard time grasping the risk involved with BTC and self custody body: I have a Trezor and have been a big fan of Bitcoin and self custody after learning a lesson with a hot wallet in 2023 losing the equivalent of 1.3 BTC at the time. It’s just not safe unless you put your BTC into Robinhood that insures against you positions as they own it you just have a position in BTC once you transfer it to them. The most recent cold wallet attack is completely like the others and eventually will get linked to North Korea.. comment: p1k32lf parent: t3_1veuylf author: Adrima_the_DK created_utc: 1785803829 edited: false body: Think of it this way Also having a lot.of fiat currency in your custody is risky as it could be stolen. I would recommend splitting your Bitcoin into different wallets so you mitigate the risks. Do your own research and see the trusted wallets in the market. comment: p1k3lze parent: t3_1veuylf author: Prior-Book5312 created_utc: 1785804006 edited: false body: No. There's good reason why Satoshi's keys, despite having no hardware wallet, have never been hacked and it's because of this video from BPI, which explains in detail the difference between Bitcoin's entropy and what the Coldcard actually did: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM) You can upgrade your Trezor's security with a passphrase, and eventually maybe consider a Multisig solution. But you're fine for now. Don't act like a cow that just runs where the herd goes because there was a bang. comment: p1km6bk parent: t1_p1k32lf author: heretilimnot3 created_utc: 1785810156 edited: false body: LolExcerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.
-
Reddit served 1 additional comment record(s); the diff preserves their text and any edits to existing records.
Recovered from the Internet Archive rather than captured by this project. The row records that third-party provenance separately from captures made by this project.
What changed from the previous capture 8 lines
edited: false body: Even then, thief would actually have to break into your house. With Bitcoin they might as well steal it from a whole different continent. + +comment: p1tc5s3 +parent: t1_p1mhppv +author: MakeItMine2024 +created_utc: 1785917383 +edited: false +body: +Why ? They are insuredExtracted text as captured
post: 1veuylf author: MakeItMine2024 created_utc: 1785803324 title: I’m having a hard time grasping the risk involved with BTC and self custody body: I have a Trezor and have been a big fan of Bitcoin and self custody after learning a lesson with a hot wallet in 2023 losing the equivalent of 1.3 BTC at the time. It’s just not safe unless you put your BTC into Robinhood that insures against you positions as they own it you just have a position in BTC once you transfer it to them. The most recent cold wallet attack is completely like the others and eventually will get linked to North Korea.. comment: p1k32lf parent: t3_1veuylf author: Adrima_the_DK created_utc: 1785803829 edited: false body: Think of it this way Also having a lot.of fiat currency in your custody is risky as it could be stolen. I would recommend splitting your Bitcoin into different wallets so you mitigate the risks. Do your own research and see the trusted wallets in the market. comment: p1k3lze parent: t3_1veuylf author: Prior-Book5312 created_utc: 1785804006 edited: false body: No. There's good reason why Satoshi's keys, despite having no hardware wallet, have never been hacked and it's because of this video from BPI, which explains in detail the difference between Bitcoin's entropy and what the Coldcard actually did: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM) You can upgrade your Trezor's security with a passphrase, and eventually maybe consider a Multisig solution. But you're fine for now. Don't act like a cow that just runs where the herd goes because there was a bang. comment: p1km6bk parent: t1_p1k32lf author: heretilimnot3 created_utc: 1785810156 edited: false body: LolExcerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.
-
The Reddit thread gained 1 new comment.
Recovered from the Internet Archive rather than captured by this project. The row records that third-party provenance separately from captures made by this project.
What changed from the previous capture 8 lines
edited: false body: Satoshi's keys were before the seed phrase was a think. It's just a long private key. There were no words back then + +comment: p1p6n8q +parent: t1_p1l606d +author: junkhead_7 +created_utc: 1785867542 +edited: false +body: +Even then, thief would actually have to break into your house. With Bitcoin they might as well steal it from a whole different continent.Extracted text as captured
post: 1veuylf author: MakeItMine2024 created_utc: 1785803324 title: I’m having a hard time grasping the risk involved with BTC and self custody body: I have a Trezor and have been a big fan of Bitcoin and self custody after learning a lesson with a hot wallet in 2023 losing the equivalent of 1.3 BTC at the time. It’s just not safe unless you put your BTC into Robinhood that insures against you positions as they own it you just have a position in BTC once you transfer it to them. The most recent cold wallet attack is completely like the others and eventually will get linked to North Korea.. comment: p1k32lf parent: t3_1veuylf author: Adrima_the_DK created_utc: 1785803829 edited: false body: Think of it this way Also having a lot.of fiat currency in your custody is risky as it could be stolen. I would recommend splitting your Bitcoin into different wallets so you mitigate the risks. Do your own research and see the trusted wallets in the market. comment: p1k3lze parent: t3_1veuylf author: Prior-Book5312 created_utc: 1785804006 edited: false body: No. There's good reason why Satoshi's keys, despite having no hardware wallet, have never been hacked and it's because of this video from BPI, which explains in detail the difference between Bitcoin's entropy and what the Coldcard actually did: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM) You can upgrade your Trezor's security with a passphrase, and eventually maybe consider a Multisig solution. But you're fine for now. Don't act like a cow that just runs where the herd goes because there was a bang. comment: p1km6bk parent: t1_p1k32lf author: heretilimnot3 created_utc: 1785810156 edited: false body: LolExcerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.
-
Two new comments were posted by JunketTurbulent2114: citing Mt. Gox as the opposite lesson for older users, and noting Satoshi's keys predate seed phrases and were just long private keys.
Recovered from the Internet Archive rather than captured by this project. The row records that third-party provenance separately from captures made by this project.
What changed from the previous capture 16 lines
edited: false body: Putting your BTC into Robin Hood is not safe + +comment: p1mkioh +parent: t3_1veuylf +author: JunketTurbulent2114 +created_utc: 1785841277 +edited: false +body: +So the lesson for older users was the exact opposite. Ask Mt. Gox. + +comment: p1mkoo9 +parent: t1_p1kx2qd +author: JunketTurbulent2114 +created_utc: 1785841345 +edited: false +body: +Satoshi's keys were before the seed phrase was a think. It's just a long private key. There were no words back thenExtracted text as captured
post: 1veuylf author: MakeItMine2024 created_utc: 1785803324 title: I’m having a hard time grasping the risk involved with BTC and self custody body: I have a Trezor and have been a big fan of Bitcoin and self custody after learning a lesson with a hot wallet in 2023 losing the equivalent of 1.3 BTC at the time. It’s just not safe unless you put your BTC into Robinhood that insures against you positions as they own it you just have a position in BTC once you transfer it to them. The most recent cold wallet attack is completely like the others and eventually will get linked to North Korea.. comment: p1k32lf parent: t3_1veuylf author: Adrima_the_DK created_utc: 1785803829 edited: false body: Think of it this way Also having a lot.of fiat currency in your custody is risky as it could be stolen. I would recommend splitting your Bitcoin into different wallets so you mitigate the risks. Do your own research and see the trusted wallets in the market. comment: p1k3lze parent: t3_1veuylf author: Prior-Book5312 created_utc: 1785804006 edited: false body: No. There's good reason why Satoshi's keys, despite having no hardware wallet, have never been hacked and it's because of this video from BPI, which explains in detail the difference between Bitcoin's entropy and what the Coldcard actually did: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM) You can upgrade your Trezor's security with a passphrase, and eventually maybe consider a Multisig solution. But you're fine for now. Don't act like a cow that just runs where the herd goes because there was a bang. comment: p1km6bk parent: t1_p1k32lf author: heretilimnot3 created_utc: 1785810156 edited: false body: LolExcerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.
-
One new comment was posted: Disavowed_Rogue ('Putting your BTC into Robin Hood is not safe').
Recovered from the Internet Archive rather than captured by this project. The row records that third-party provenance separately from captures made by this project.
What changed from the previous capture 8 lines
edited: false body: The risk of fiat currency is loss of value due to inflation. Dollars in a FDIC insured account are quite safe from theft. A better analogy would be gold coins that you keep in a home safe. + +comment: p1mhppv +parent: t3_1veuylf +author: Disavowed_Rogue +created_utc: 1785840126 +edited: false +body: +Putting your BTC into Robin Hood is not safeExtracted text as captured
post: 1veuylf author: MakeItMine2024 created_utc: 1785803324 title: I’m having a hard time grasping the risk involved with BTC and self custody body: I have a Trezor and have been a big fan of Bitcoin and self custody after learning a lesson with a hot wallet in 2023 losing the equivalent of 1.3 BTC at the time. It’s just not safe unless you put your BTC into Robinhood that insures against you positions as they own it you just have a position in BTC once you transfer it to them. The most recent cold wallet attack is completely like the others and eventually will get linked to North Korea.. comment: p1k32lf parent: t3_1veuylf author: Adrima_the_DK created_utc: 1785803829 edited: false body: Think of it this way Also having a lot.of fiat currency in your custody is risky as it could be stolen. I would recommend splitting your Bitcoin into different wallets so you mitigate the risks. Do your own research and see the trusted wallets in the market. comment: p1k3lze parent: t3_1veuylf author: Prior-Book5312 created_utc: 1785804006 edited: false body: No. There's good reason why Satoshi's keys, despite having no hardware wallet, have never been hacked and it's because of this video from BPI, which explains in detail the difference between Bitcoin's entropy and what the Coldcard actually did: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM) You can upgrade your Trezor's security with a passphrase, and eventually maybe consider a Multisig solution. But you're fine for now. Don't act like a cow that just runs where the herd goes because there was a bang. comment: p1km6bk parent: t1_p1k32lf author: heretilimnot3 created_utc: 1785810156 edited: false body: LolExcerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.
-
Recovered from the Internet Archive rather than captured by this project. The row records that third-party provenance separately from captures made by this project.
What changed from the previous capture 0 lines
Extracted text as captured
post: 1veuylf author: MakeItMine2024 created_utc: 1785803324 title: I’m having a hard time grasping the risk involved with BTC and self custody body: I have a Trezor and have been a big fan of Bitcoin and self custody after learning a lesson with a hot wallet in 2023 losing the equivalent of 1.3 BTC at the time. It’s just not safe unless you put your BTC into Robinhood that insures against you positions as they own it you just have a position in BTC once you transfer it to them. The most recent cold wallet attack is completely like the others and eventually will get linked to North Korea.. comment: p1k32lf parent: t3_1veuylf author: Adrima_the_DK created_utc: 1785803829 edited: false body: Think of it this way Also having a lot.of fiat currency in your custody is risky as it could be stolen. I would recommend splitting your Bitcoin into different wallets so you mitigate the risks. Do your own research and see the trusted wallets in the market. comment: p1k3lze parent: t3_1veuylf author: Prior-Book5312 created_utc: 1785804006 edited: false body: No. There's good reason why Satoshi's keys, despite having no hardware wallet, have never been hacked and it's because of this video from BPI, which explains in detail the difference between Bitcoin's entropy and what the Coldcard actually did: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwrKWdxt0YM) You can upgrade your Trezor's security with a passphrase, and eventually maybe consider a Multisig solution. But you're fine for now. Don't act like a cow that just runs where the herd goes because there was a bang. comment: p1km6bk parent: t1_p1k32lf author: heretilimnot3 created_utc: 1785810156 edited: false body: LolExcerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.
0 presentation-noise differences. Sidebar, ticker and other page chrome churn that our review classified as not being changes to what the source says.
The excerpts and plain unified diffs above show the text this project held and how it changed. To verify a quotation, compare it against the page itself or against the Internet Archive's copies, which are independent of this project.
Complete captures are held offline rather than mirrored here, so this page shows diffs and excerpts. If a quotation is ever disputed, the full copy can be produced. Ask.
Compare the screenshot or a quotation against the original while it is available.