r/coldcard: update for users affected by the 5.6.0 soft brick
reddit-soft-brick-5-6-0
https://www.reddit.com/r/coldcard/comments/1vg6um3/update_for_everyone_affected_from_the_soft_brick/
Latest reviewed change
source content difference between and
New comment from WBDubya advising taking a sledgehammer to anything from Coldcard.
I like the QWERTY keyboard. Nice if you’re working on it.
Imagine what these wallets will look like in 10 years?
+
+comment: p251xg6
+parent: t3_1vg6um3
+author: WBDubya
+created_utc: 1786050508
First lines only. The complete diff is in the timeline below.
- Organisation
- Evidence role
- Community discussion
- Published
- not established
- Source changes
- 1
- Detected differences
- 1
- Unreviewed
- 0
- Copies held
- 2
Every check is recorded, including checks that found no text change. A detected edit is therefore bounded between two checks. The publisher's exact save time is not observable from this record. Last checked .
This post is held twice: here, with this project's own note on why it matters, and again as part of the conversation captured at , which is polled for changes. Both copies are the same post; neither is a separate event.
Snapshot and diff bodies for this chain monitor are held in the local evidence archive but withheld from the public site because they can contain the addresses of people who published nothing themselves. Capture times and reviewed change summaries remain available below.
Held captures
-
New comment from WBDubya advising taking a sledgehammer to anything from Coldcard.
Recovered from the Internet Archive rather than captured by this project. The row records that third-party provenance separately from captures made by this project.
What changed from the previous capture 8 lines
I like the QWERTY keyboard. Nice if you’re working on it. Imagine what these wallets will look like in 10 years? + +comment: p251xg6 +parent: t3_1vg6um3 +author: WBDubya +created_utc: 1786050508 +edited: false +body: +Just take a sledgehammer to anything from ColdCard.Extracted text as captured
post: 1vg6um3 author: lucapocchio created_utc: 1785935162 title: Update for everyone affected from the soft brick of 5.6.0 comment: p1ur98f parent: t3_1vg6um3 author: Far-Department-4196 created_utc: 1785937140 edited: false body: Luckily this didn’t happen to me after updating to 5.6.0 on my mk4. Is anyone going to trust coldcard to generate a new seed even with dice rolls? comment: p1uruqo parent: t3_1vg6um3 author: JumpProfessional3372 created_utc: 1785937307 edited: false body: I'm glad you managed to recover the device. So it seems the device holds some energy after being unplugged. Have you been impacted by this the RNG issue, or you never used CC RNG? (Paranoid Guide). Or. you used it but thanks to the passphrase you could migrate to a new wallet? comment: p1utbp7 parent: t1_p1ur98f author: JumpProfessional3372 created_utc: 1785937714 edited: false body: I'd but only if I wanted to generate a spending wallet. with let's say, 5% of the BTC savings. And only if this code gets review by some developers and looks fine. Coinkite needs to release 5.6.1 due to this bug from OP and who knows how many more. So 5.6.0 is not recommendable right now. comment: p1v6h76 parent: t1_p1uruqo author: lucapocchio created_utc: 1785941225 edited: false body:Excerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.
-
Recovered from the Internet Archive rather than captured by this project. The row records that third-party provenance separately from captures made by this project.
What changed from the previous capture 0 lines
Extracted text as captured
post: 1vg6um3 author: lucapocchio created_utc: 1785935162 title: Update for everyone affected from the soft brick of 5.6.0 comment: p1ur98f parent: t3_1vg6um3 author: Far-Department-4196 created_utc: 1785937140 edited: false body: Luckily this didn’t happen to me after updating to 5.6.0 on my mk4. Is anyone going to trust coldcard to generate a new seed even with dice rolls? comment: p1uruqo parent: t3_1vg6um3 author: JumpProfessional3372 created_utc: 1785937307 edited: false body: I'm glad you managed to recover the device. So it seems the device holds some energy after being unplugged. Have you been impacted by this the RNG issue, or you never used CC RNG? (Paranoid Guide). Or. you used it but thanks to the passphrase you could migrate to a new wallet? comment: p1utbp7 parent: t1_p1ur98f author: JumpProfessional3372 created_utc: 1785937714 edited: false body: I'd but only if I wanted to generate a spending wallet. with let's say, 5% of the BTC savings. And only if this code gets review by some developers and looks fine. Coinkite needs to release 5.6.1 due to this bug from OP and who knows how many more. So 5.6.0 is not recommendable right now. comment: p1v6h76 parent: t1_p1uruqo author: lucapocchio created_utc: 1785941225 edited: false body:Excerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.
0 presentation-noise differences. Sidebar, ticker and other page chrome churn that our review classified as not being changes to what the source says.
The excerpts and plain unified diffs above show the text this project held and how it changed. To verify a quotation, compare it against the page itself or against the Internet Archive's copies, which are independent of this project.
Complete captures are held offline rather than mirrored here, so this page shows diffs and excerpts. If a quotation is ever disputed, the full copy can be produced. Ask.
Compare the screenshot or a quotation against the original while it is available.