COLDCARD RNG incident the public record, collected and explained
Informational only, and this site never asks for your seed words. details

Informational only. This is an open source collection of what others have published about the incident, together with an explanation of it. It is not financial, security or legal advice, and not a substitute for professional advice about your own situation. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or speaking for Coinkite. Material is attributed and quoted as published; where sources disagree their scenarios are kept separate with their assumptions rather than reconciled into one answer. Everything is meant to be checked against the linked evidence rather than taken on trust. Act on your own judgement about a particular situation. Editorial standards and corrections.

Do not disclose recovery material to a website, form, message or support account. This site never asks for it, and contributions containing recovery words or private keys are not accepted.

River 2084654194913403137

river-2084654194913403137

https://x.com/River/status/2084654194913403137

Captured screenshot of the post by @River, posted 4 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC
@River posted captured full-size capture → original post →
Author
@River
Organisation
independent
Evidence role
historical-precedent
Posted
Capture status
capture held

River recalling Hal Finney's 1995 challenge to break 40-bit encryption, cracked a month later by Adam Back and three others. Registered as the historical framing that circulated during the incident, on how key-space assumptions decay. It is background rather than a claim about this defect, and the archive holds the earlier predictable-key incidents separately as the closer precedents.

This post is registered as evidence and has a locally held capture. The original remains the canonical publication.

How to check this yourself

Compare the screenshot or a quotation against the original while it is available.