COLDCARD RNG incident the public record, collected and explained
Informational only, and this site never asks for your seed words. details

Informational only. This is an open source collection of what others have published about the incident, together with an explanation of it. It is not financial, security or legal advice, and not a substitute for professional advice about your own situation. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or speaking for Coinkite. Material is attributed and quoted as published; where sources disagree their scenarios are kept separate with their assumptions rather than reconciled into one answer. Everything is meant to be checked against the linked evidence rather than taken on trust. Act on your own judgement about a particular situation. Editorial standards and corrections.

Do not disclose recovery material to a website, form, message or support account. This site never asks for it, and contributions containing recovery words or private keys are not accepted.

Security policy coverage across scanned projects

rob1ham-2085477372938060221

https://x.com/Rob1Ham/status/2085477372938060221

Captured screenshot of the post by @Rob1Ham, posted 6 Aug 2026, 21:25 UTC
@Rob1Ham posted captured full-size capture → original post →
Author
@Rob1Ham
Organisation
independent
Evidence role
social statement
Posted
Capture status
capture held

Rob Hamilton urges projects that touch people's money to publish a SECURITY.md, quoting calle's post that outreach is the campaign's biggest bottleneck. The quoted card carries the measurement behind the plea, taken over 426 reviewed projects: 19.5 per cent publish a SECURITY.md, 13.1 per cent expose an extractable security email, 28 route through GitHub advisories or a bug bounty with no email, and 342 have no published policy at all. That figure for how reachable bitcoin projects are for disclosure is the reason to hold this rather than the exhortation, and it is one of the few Red Team outputs stated as a proportion rather than a count of findings. Hamilton co-leads the campaign that produced the numbers and the underlying dataset is not published. The figures are the campaign's own and are not checked here.

This post is registered as evidence and has a locally held capture. The original remains the canonical publication.

How to check this yourself

Compare the screenshot or a quotation against the original while it is available.