COLDCARD RNG incident the public record, collected and explained
Informational only, and this site never asks for your seed words. details

Informational only. This is an open source collection of what others have published about the incident, together with an explanation of it. It is not financial, security or legal advice, and not a substitute for professional advice about your own situation. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or speaking for Coinkite. Material is attributed and quoted as published; where sources disagree their scenarios are kept separate with their assumptions rather than reconciled into one answer. Everything is meant to be checked against the linked evidence rather than taken on trust. Act on your own judgement about a particular situation. Editorial standards and corrections.

Do not disclose recovery material to a website, form, message or support account. This site never asks for it, and contributions containing recovery words or private keys are not accepted.

Aantonop from 2020 nails trust, seed generation and system complexity

stackernews-aantonop-2020-clip

https://stacker.news/items/1538724

Organisation
Stacker News
Evidence role
Community discussion
Published
2026-08-02
Source changes
0
Detected differences
0
Unreviewed
0
Copies held
1

sime resurfacing a 2020 aantonop talk on trust, seed generation and system complexity as prescient for this incident. Discussion of where trust sits in self custody. Captured through the site's public GraphQL API: the rendered pages crash the capture tab, and the API answers POST from this host. The query fixes the captured surface to the item's title, text and two levels of comments, each with author and absolute timestamp.

Every check is recorded, including checks that found no text change. A detected edit is therefore bounded between two checks. The publisher's exact save time is not observable from this record. Last checked .

  1. Earliest copy held Current
    seen · Captured here 3,060 chars
    Extracted text as captured
    {
      "data": {
        "item": {
          "comments": {
            "comments": [
              {
                "createdAt": "2026-08-03T05:16:38.374Z",
                "text": "### **(Gemini Summary of Key Takeaways)**\n\n* **The Necessity of Trust (0:00 - 1:00):** *Andreas* explains that absolute zero-trust is impractical for most users, as performing cryptographic tasks like hashing or curve multiplication manually with pen and paper is error-prone. Some level of trust in a device is necessary.\n* **Hardware Wallets vs. DIY Solutions (1:00 - 2:37):** He warns against \"DIY\" security methods (like using old laptops or non-purpose-built software), noting that moving from specialized hardware to general-purpose systems often increases the attack surface and the likelihood of user error.\n* **Why We Trust Hardware Wallets (2:37 - 4:20):** Trust in hardware wallets is not placed solely in the manufacturer, but in the collective scrutiny of the security community. Experts regularly audit these devices for vulnerabilities, making them the most secure standard for cold storage.\n* **Precautions for High-Value Assets (4:20 - 6:35):** For those managing very large amounts, *Andreas* suggests advanced precautions:\n  * **Manual Entropy:** Use devices like the *Coldcard*, which allow users to generate their own seeds using dice or manual entry to remove manufacturer trust (5:40 - 6:00).\n  * **Avoid Online Tools:** Never use online seed generation tools, as they are high-risk targets for hijacking (5:04 - 5:14).\n  * **Balance Complexity:** He emphasizes that the most secure solution is only useful if the user can operate it without making mistakes; for the average user, the simplicity of a hardware wallet remains the \"sweet spot\" for security (4:04 - 4:18).\n\n***\n\nHe nails the manual entropy advice, but over-estimated the security audits \n\n😭",
                "user": {
                  "name": "gmd"
                }
              },
              {
                "createdAt": "2026-08-03T08:30:21.295Z",
                "text": "My best teacher and first exposure into Bitcoin",
                "user": {
                  "name": "lunanto"
                }
              },
              {
                "createdAt": "2026-08-03T04:01:33.674Z",
                "text": "🔗 Privacy-friendly: https://yt.chocolatemoo53.com/watch?v=cONG2ZNjJ0c",
                "user": {
                  "name": "YewTuBot"
                }
              },
              {
                "createdAt": "2026-08-03T05:40:05.372Z",
                "text": "don't trust the experts",
                "user": {
                  "name": "88b0c423eb"
                }
              },
              {
                "createdAt": "2026-08-02T23:20:39.044Z",
                "text": "Trust no1",
                "user": {
                  "name": "LAXITIVA"
                }
              }

    Excerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.

How to check this yourself

The excerpts and plain unified diffs above show the text this project held and how it changed. To verify a quotation, compare it against the page itself or against the Internet Archive's copies, which are independent of this project.

Complete captures are held offline rather than mirrored here, so this page shows diffs and excerpts. If a quotation is ever disputed, the full copy can be produced. Ask.