In case you thought self custody was mainstream...

stackernews-exchanges-no-psa

Organisation: Stacker News
Evidence role: Community discussion
Published: 2026-07-31
Source changes: 0
Detected differences: 0
Unreviewed: 0
Copies held: 1

Scoresby checking exchange social accounts and finding no COLDCARD warnings, with screenshots. Held as evidence of provider silence in the first day, complementing the custody-coverage record; the screenshots themselves are images this text capture does not hold. Captured through the site's public GraphQL API: the rendered pages crash the capture tab, and the API answers POST from this host. The query fixes the captured surface to the item's title, text and two levels of comments, each with author and absolute timestamp.

Every check is recorded, including checks that found no text change. A detected edit is therefore bounded between two checks. The publisher's exact save time is not observable from this record. Last checked 7 Aug 2026, 00:05 UTC.

Earliest copy held Current

seen 4 Aug 2026, 04:15 UTC · Captured here 3,180 chars

What changed from the previous capture 0 lines

Extracted text as captured

{
  "data": {
    "item": {
      "comments": {
        "comments": [
          {
            "createdAt": "2026-07-31T22:40:00.904Z",
            "text": "What would be their incentive to talk about it?\n\nIf they think their customers would mostly just be scared away from bitcoin over the news (and are unlikely to otherwise hear about it), I think they keep their traps shut.",
            "user": {
              "name": "Undisciplined"
            }
          },
          {
            "createdAt": "2026-08-01T07:10:12.255Z",
            "text": "Are you sure this isn't because the search is broken or syntax incorrect? Can you include an example where it successfully finds an entry?",
            "user": {
              "name": "tomlaies"
            }
          },
          {
            "createdAt": "2026-08-01T01:31:39.633Z",
            "text": "Say a similar vulnerability was found in a Ledger there'd probably be 10x the amount of Bitcoin stolen.",
            "user": {
              "name": "OT"
            }
          },
          {
            "createdAt": "2026-08-01T02:29:18.364Z",
            "text": "We're not a blip on their radar. It's a good and bad sometimes. \n\nI already made a post about how annoyed I am seeing small outlets in our space blaming this on AI. I would truly ***hate*** to see major media outlets do the same, so I'm glad that hasn't happened and I'm hoping it stays this way.\n\n(It might not. Tomorrow there very well might be headlines about AI hacking Bitcoin, who the fuck knows!)",
            "user": {
              "name": "Aeneas"
            }
          },
          {
            "createdAt": "2026-08-01T08:45:00.071Z",
            "text": "The silence also shows where exchange onboarding stops: at purchase and withdrawal, not at custody verification. In a Bitcoin Core 31.1 drill, a funded wallet and a watch-only wallet both displayed 0.01000000 BTC. The difference only appeared when signing and recovery were tested. A vendor-neutral PSA could teach receipt, signing, and recovery without recommending a particular wallet.",
            "user": {
              "name": "CoraAegis"
            }
          }

Excerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.

How to check this yourself

The excerpts and plain unified diffs above show the text this project held and how it changed. To verify a quotation, compare it against the page itself or against the Internet Archive's copies, which are independent of this project.

Complete captures are held offline rather than mirrored here, so this page shows diffs and excerpts. If a quotation is ever disputed, the full copy can be produced. Ask.

Held captures