COLDCARD RNG incident the public record, collected and explained
Informational only, and this site never asks for your seed words. details

Informational only. This is an open source collection of what others have published about the incident, together with an explanation of it. It is not financial, security or legal advice, and not a substitute for professional advice about your own situation. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or speaking for Coinkite. Material is attributed and quoted as published; where sources disagree their scenarios are kept separate with their assumptions rather than reconciled into one answer. Everything is meant to be checked against the linked evidence rather than taken on trust. Act on your own judgement about a particular situation. Editorial standards and corrections.

Do not disclose recovery material to a website, form, message or support account. This site never asks for it, and contributions containing recovery words or private keys are not accepted.

Is Coldcard legally responsible for the lost of the funds?

stackernews-legal-responsibility

https://stacker.news/items/1537215

Organisation
Stacker News
Evidence role
Community discussion
Published
2026-07-31
Source changes
0
Detected differences
0
Unreviewed
0
Copies held
1

Bitcoiner1 asking whether Coinkite is legally responsible for the lost funds. Early community framing of the liability question; no legal reasoning here is endorsed. Captured through the site's public GraphQL API: the rendered pages crash the capture tab, and the API answers POST from this host. The query fixes the captured surface to the item's title, text and two levels of comments, each with author and absolute timestamp.

Every check is recorded, including checks that found no text change. A detected edit is therefore bounded between two checks. The publisher's exact save time is not observable from this record. Last checked .

  1. Earliest copy held Current
    seen · Captured here 3,575 chars
    Extracted text as captured
    {
      "data": {
        "item": {
          "comments": {
            "comments": [
              {
                "createdAt": "2026-07-31T18:12:10.870Z",
                "text": "A lesson I learned early in business when I took a contractor to small claims court. \"You can't draw blood from a stone\". \n\nCoinkite is cooked. They aren't a big enough company to be insured for an incident of this magnitude. Sure you could probably sue them and once they are stripped of their meager assets by a bankruptcy court, creditors are paid, employees are paid etc there is likely nothing left and if there was anything it really would be almost nothing when split amongst affected users. \n\nThe only way users could possibly get their funds or a portion of their funds back is if the hackers were caught with the Bitcoin and it was seized by law enforcement. Maybe there would be some sort of path but even that seems pretty unlikely you would have to prove ownership of the wallet, prove that wallet generated that seed, prove you didn't move the funds yourself. Seems pretty unlikely and a high bar to meet.",
                "user": {
                  "name": "grayruby"
                }
              },
              {
                "createdAt": "2026-07-31T20:45:14.417Z",
                "text": "In the Province of Ontario, Directors can be held personally liable for negligence.",
                "user": {
                  "name": "anon"
                }
              },
              {
                "createdAt": "2026-07-31T19:17:37.503Z",
                "text": "fried!\nhttps://stacker.news/items/1536844",
                "user": {
                  "name": "UppercaseDANIEL"
                }
              },
              {
                "createdAt": "2026-07-31T18:47:32.090Z",
                "text": "Definitely dead.\n\nI do wonder if cold card themselves got drained, then there'd be no funds to claw back even if buyers were successful suing them.",
                "user": {
                  "name": "ThatWhichisNotSeen"
                }
              },
              {
                "createdAt": "2026-07-31T18:32:57.292Z",
                "text": "Very interesting feedback. Thanks",
                "user": {
                  "name": "Bitcoiner1"
                }
              },

    Excerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.

How to check this yourself

The excerpts and plain unified diffs above show the text this project held and how it changed. To verify a quotation, compare it against the page itself or against the Internet Archive's copies, which are independent of this project.

Complete captures are held offline rather than mirrored here, so this page shows diffs and excerpts. If a quotation is ever disputed, the full copy can be produced. Ask.