nvk deleting tweets as we speak. Backup and screenshoot interactions with him!
stackernews-nvk-deleted-posts
Latest reviewed change
source content difference between and
New comment by rblb speculates that bulk-deleting tweets is what a smart bad-faith actor would do to quietly remove a few specific ones, calling it the worst possible look.
"text": "Deleting tweets is a bad look.",
"user": {
"name": "Scoresby"
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "createdAt": "2026-08-06T18:31:05.950Z",
+ "text": "This is very odd, and I'm not saying this is necessarily the reason, but a smart person in bad faith would do exactly something like this if there were a few tweets that weren't obviously incriminating, but that they really wanted deleted without drawing attention to them.\n\nIt proves nothing, of course, but it is not a good look. In fact, it may be the worst possible look IMO.",
First lines only. The complete diff is in the timeline below.
- Organisation
- Stacker News
- Evidence role
- Community discussion
- Published
- 2026-08-05
- Source changes
- 1
- Detected differences
- 1
- Unreviewed
- 0
- Copies held
- 2
raw_avocado asking readers to preserve NVK's public interactions amid a reported deletion of posts, with an eight-comment discussion. A record of the community's preservation response during the incident, not confirmation that any particular post was deleted or of what it said. Captured through the site's public GraphQL API: the rendered pages crash the capture tab, and the API answers POST from this host. The query fixes the captured surface to the item's title, text and two levels of comments, each with author and absolute timestamp.
Every check is recorded, including checks that found no text change. A detected edit is therefore bounded between two checks. The publisher's exact save time is not observable from this record. Last checked .
This post is held twice: here, with this project's own note on why it matters, and again as part of the conversation captured at , which is polled for changes. Both copies are the same post; neither is a separate event.
Snapshot and diff bodies for this chain monitor are held in the local evidence archive but withheld from the public site because they can contain the addresses of people who published nothing themselves. Capture times and reviewed change summaries remain available below.
Held captures
-
New comment by rblb speculates that bulk-deleting tweets is what a smart bad-faith actor would do to quietly remove a few specific ones, calling it the worst possible look.
Recovered from the Internet Archive rather than captured by this project. The row records that third-party provenance separately from captures made by this project.
What changed from the previous capture 7 lines
"text": "Deleting tweets is a bad look.", "user": { "name": "Scoresby" + } + }, + { + "createdAt": "2026-08-06T18:31:05.950Z", + "text": "This is very odd, and I'm not saying this is necessarily the reason, but a smart person in bad faith would do exactly something like this if there were a few tweets that weren't obviously incriminating, but that they really wanted deleted without drawing attention to them.\n\nIt proves nothing, of course, but it is not a good look. In fact, it may be the worst possible look IMO.", + "user": { + "name": "rblb" } }, {Extracted text as captured
{ "data": { "item": { "comments": { "comments": [ { "createdAt": "2026-08-05T15:42:13.711Z", "text": "", "user": { "name": "Kruw" } }, { "createdAt": "2026-08-05T18:42:21.459Z", "text": "Deleting tweets is a bad look.", "user": { "name": "Scoresby" } }, { "createdAt": "2026-08-06T18:31:05.950Z", "text": "This is very odd, and I'm not saying this is necessarily the reason, but a smart person in bad faith would do exactly something like this if there were a few tweets that weren't obviously incriminating, but that they really wanted deleted without drawing attention to them.\n\nIt proves nothing, of course, but it is not a good look. In fact, it may be the worst possible look IMO.", "user": { "name": "rblb" } }, { "createdAt": "2026-08-06T01:45:54.138Z", "text": "dude keeps digging his grave deeper and deeper", "user": { "name": "WeAreAllSatoshi" } }, { "createdAt": "2026-08-06T01:17:19.598Z", "text": "This guy is the Nvk? Related with Koin Kite? Makes sense that something like that happened.", "user": { "name": "Fenix" } },Excerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.
-
Recovered from the Internet Archive rather than captured by this project. The row records that third-party provenance separately from captures made by this project.
What changed from the previous capture 0 lines
Extracted text as captured
{ "data": { "item": { "comments": { "comments": [ { "createdAt": "2026-08-05T15:42:13.711Z", "text": "", "user": { "name": "Kruw" } }, { "createdAt": "2026-08-05T18:42:21.459Z", "text": "Deleting tweets is a bad look.", "user": { "name": "Scoresby" } }, { "createdAt": "2026-08-06T01:45:54.138Z", "text": "dude keeps digging his grave deeper and deeper", "user": { "name": "WeAreAllSatoshi" } }, { "createdAt": "2026-08-06T01:17:19.598Z", "text": "This guy is the Nvk? Related with Koin Kite? Makes sense that something like that happened.", "user": { "name": "Fenix" } }, { "createdAt": "2026-08-05T17:46:15.249Z", "text": "\n\n\n\n \n\n", "user": { "name": "hasherstacker" } },Excerpt only. The complete copy is held offline and backs quotations on this site. The original publication remains the canonical public source.
0 presentation-noise differences. Sidebar, ticker and other page chrome churn that our review classified as not being changes to what the source says.
The excerpts and plain unified diffs above show the text this project held and how it changed. To verify a quotation, compare it against the page itself or against the Internet Archive's copies, which are independent of this project.
Complete captures are held offline rather than mirrored here, so this page shows diffs and excerpts. If a quotation is ever disputed, the full copy can be produced. Ask.
Compare the screenshot or a quotation against the original while it is available.