COLDCARD RNG incident the public record, collected and explained
Informational only, and this site never asks for your seed words. details

Informational only. This is an open source collection of what others have published about the incident, together with an explanation of it. It is not financial, security or legal advice, and not a substitute for professional advice about your own situation. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or speaking for Coinkite. Material is attributed and quoted as published; where sources disagree their scenarios are kept separate with their assumptions rather than reconciled into one answer. Everything is meant to be checked against the linked evidence rather than taken on trust. Act on your own judgement about a particular situation. Editorial standards and corrections.

Do not disclose recovery material to a website, form, message or support account. This site never asks for it, and contributions containing recovery words or private keys are not accepted.

Can self custody actually scale

stackernews-self-custody-scale

https://stacker.news/items/1537107

Organisation
Stacker News
Evidence role
Community discussion
Published
2026-07-31
Source changes
0
Detected differences
0
Unreviewed
0
Copies held
1

HardMoney asking whether self custody can scale to the masses when seasoned users doing most things right were still exposed. Part of the self-custody-tractability debate the incident reopened. Captured through the site's public GraphQL API: the rendered pages crash the capture tab, and the API answers POST from this host. The query fixes the captured surface to the item's title, text and two levels of comments, each with author and absolute timestamp.

Every check is recorded, including checks that found no text change. A detected edit is therefore bounded between two checks. The publisher's exact save time is not observable from this record. Last checked .

  1. Earliest copy held Current
    seen · Captured here 1,300 chars
    Extracted text as captured 
    {
  "data": {
    "item": {
      "comments": {
        "comments": [
          {
            "createdAt": "2026-07-31T16:35:33.763Z",
            "text": "I’ve always thought KYC custodial setups would be the norm. \n\nMost people prefer outsourcing responsibility.",
            "user": {
              "name": "Undisciplined"
            }
          },
          {
            "createdAt": "2026-07-31T16:39:39.477Z",
            "text": "Lightning provides way more than enough scalability at the moment. On chain fees are at historical lows.",
            "user": {
              "name": "Kruw"
            }
          }
        ]
      },
      "createdAt": "2026-07-31T16:30:28.940Z",
      "text": "Given that extremely seasoned bitcoiners who did most things right can be impacted by a multitude of bugs (specifically in entropy generation) do you see self custody scaling to the masses? Already was pretty difficult to sell non-technical parents and grandparents on it but now that one of the most trusted signors missed a bug for 5 years and AI LLMs are only getting better can normies actually be expected to understand the nuances and tradeoffs of self custodial bitcoin?",
      "title": "Can self custody actually scale",
      "user": {
        "name": "HardMoney"
      }
    }
  }
}
How to check this yourself

The excerpts and plain unified diffs above show the text this project held and how it changed. To verify a quotation, compare it against the page itself or against the Internet Archive's copies, which are independent of this project.

Complete captures are held offline rather than mirrored here, so this page shows diffs and excerpts. If a quotation is ever disputed, the full copy can be produced. Ask.