COLDCARD RNG incident the public record, collected and explained
Informational only, and this site never asks for your seed words. details

Informational only. This is an open source collection of what others have published about the incident, together with an explanation of it. It is not financial, security or legal advice, and not a substitute for professional advice about your own situation. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or speaking for Coinkite. Material is attributed and quoted as published; where sources disagree their scenarios are kept separate with their assumptions rather than reconciled into one answer. Everything is meant to be checked against the linked evidence rather than taken on trust. Act on your own judgement about a particular situation. Editorial standards and corrections.

Do not disclose recovery material to a website, form, message or support account. This site never asks for it, and contributions containing recovery words or private keys are not accepted.

Ill Bloom proof-of-concept alert

threatwire_-2085593099749749082

https://x.com/threatwire_/status/2085593099749749082

Captured screenshot of the post by @threatwire_, posted 7 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC
@threatwire_ posted captured full-size capture → original post →
Author
@threatwire_
Organisation
independent
Evidence role
social statement
Posted
Capture status
capture held

A security-news account reporting that a public proof of concept has been released for Ill Bloom, described as a twelve-year-old weak-entropy flaw in CryptoJS, and linking a GitHub repository holding it. It says the flaw reduced seed-phrase entropy to 2^39, in the post's words "just 2^39 bits", and that brute-force attacks have already drained US$5.69M from 2,114 wallets. This is a separate defect from the COLDCARD one, held because it is the parallel weak-entropy story running in the same week and because another registered source describes an affected wallet in the same terms. None of the figures, the proof of concept or the loss total is checked here, and the claims are the poster's own.

This post is registered as evidence and has a locally held capture. The original remains the canonical publication.

How to check this yourself

Compare the screenshot or a quotation against the original while it is available.