Foundation CEO on the source of wallet-industry vitriol
zherbert-2085548862878466251
- Author
- @zherbert
- Organisation
- independent
- Evidence role
- social statement
- Posted
- 7 Aug 2026, 02:09 UTC
- Capture status
- capture held
Answering a quoted line that the Bitcoin wallet industry is petty and dramatic, Zach Herbert argues there is no industry-wide infighting and that one CEO is responsible for it, naming NVK. He describes his own company's dealings with Blockstream, BitBox, Trezor, Bitkey, SeedSigner and Ledger as collegial and competitive, credits Ledger's security research and disclosure participation, and sets out a five-step pattern he says was used against competitors and researchers: public attack, a defence, repetition until the claim becomes common knowledge, pressure on the target to stay civil, and no equivalent pressure on the attacker. The post then makes further specific allegations about the same named individual's off-platform conduct, involving domain registrations, approaches to funders and event organisers, and coordinated pile-ons; those allegations are described here rather than repeated, and no held source corroborates them. Interest: Herbert is co-founder and CEO of Foundation Devices, a direct competitor, and the post names his company; the same author's longer account is at zherbert-nvk-conduct-record. The account is his own first-hand testimony and is not verified here.
This post is registered as evidence and has a locally held capture. The original remains the canonical publication. Last checked .
This post is held twice: here, with this project's own note on why it matters, and again as part of the conversation captured at , which is polled for changes. Both copies are the same post; neither is a separate event.
Snapshot and diff bodies for this chain monitor are held in the local evidence archive but withheld from the public site because they can contain the addresses of people who published nothing themselves. Capture times and reviewed change summaries remain available below.
Held captures
0 presentation-noise differences. Sidebar, ticker and other page chrome churn that our review classified as not being changes to what the source says.
The excerpts and plain unified diffs above show the text this project held and how it changed. To verify a quotation, compare it against the page itself or against the Internet Archive's copies, which are independent of this project.
Complete captures are held offline rather than mirrored here, so this page shows diffs and excerpts. If a quotation is ever disputed, the full copy can be produced. Ask.
Compare the screenshot or a quotation against the original while it is available.